Skip to main content

Are you on the right long-term path? Get a full financial assessment

Get a full financial assessment
← Back to I Definitions

Ifrs 9"

What Is IFRS 9?

IFRS 9, or International Financial Reporting Standard 9, is an accounting standard issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) that addresses the accounting treatment of financial instruments. Falling under the broader category of financial reporting standards, IFRS 9 provides comprehensive guidance on the classification and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities, the impairment of financial assets, and hedge accounting. Its objective is to improve and simplify the reporting of financial instruments and provide more relevant and useful information to users of financial statements.

History and Origin

The development of IFRS 9 was a multi-phase project initiated by the IASB in response to criticisms of its predecessor standard, IAS 39 'Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement'. Concerns arose, particularly during the 2008 global financial crisis, regarding the complexity of IAS 39 and the delayed recognition of credit losses on loans and receivables46, 47, 48. The IASB aimed to address these deficiencies by replacing IAS 39 with a more robust and forward-looking standard.

The first phase of IFRS 9, focusing on the classification and measurement of financial assets, was issued in November 200945. This was followed by requirements for financial liabilities in October 2010 and the new general hedge accounting model in November 201342, 43, 44. The final version of IFRS 9, which incorporated a new Expected Credit Loss (ECL) impairment model, was issued on July 24, 2014, with a mandatory effective date for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 201840, 41. This phased approach allowed entities to progressively adopt components of the standard.

Key Takeaways

  • IFRS 9 replaced IAS 39 to simplify accounting for financial instruments and ensure more timely recognition of credit losses.
  • It introduced a new principles-based approach for the classification and measurement of financial assets and liabilities.
  • The standard mandates an "expected credit loss" model for impairment, requiring provisions for future potential losses.
  • IFRS 9 reformed hedge accounting to better align with an entity's risk management activities.
  • The standard aims to provide users of financial statements with more relevant and useful information regarding financial instruments.

Interpreting IFRS 9

Interpreting IFRS 9 involves understanding its core principles across classification, measurement, impairment, and hedge accounting. For financial assets, the standard's classification depends on two main criteria: the entity's business model for managing the assets and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the asset39. This principles-based approach means that assets are generally measured at amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income (OCI), or fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL)38.

A key interpretation shift lies in the impairment model. Instead of recognizing losses only when they are "incurred," IFRS 9 requires entities to account for expected credit losses at all times, reflecting a forward-looking perspective36, 37. This means that a provision for potential losses must be made even before a default event has occurred, providing earlier and potentially higher recognition of provisions compared to previous standards34, 35.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a commercial bank that issues a five-year loan of $1,000,000 to a corporate client. Under IFRS 9, the bank must immediately assess the credit risk of this loan upon initial recognition.

  1. Initial Assessment (Stage 1): At the time of origination, the bank determines that there has been no significant increase in credit risk since the loan was issued. The bank calculates the 12-month ECL, which represents the portion of lifetime expected credit losses that result from default events possible within the next 12 months. Let's say, based on historical data and forward-looking economic forecasts, the 12-month ECL is estimated to be $5,000. This $5,000 would be recognized as an impairment loss in the statement of financial position.
  2. Subsequent Reporting Period (Stage 2): One year later, due to an unexpected downturn in the client's industry, the bank assesses that there has been a significant increase in the loan's credit risk, although no actual default has occurred. At this point, IFRS 9 requires the bank to recognize lifetime ECL, meaning the expected credit losses over the entire remaining life of the loan. If the lifetime ECL is now estimated at $30,000, the bank adjusts its impairment allowance to this higher amount, recognizing an additional $25,000 impairment loss ($30,000 - $5,000 previously recognized).
  3. Credit-Impaired (Stage 3): Two years into the loan, the client misses several payments, indicating objective evidence of impairment. The loan is now considered credit-impaired. The bank continues to recognize lifetime ECL, but interest income on the loan would now be calculated on a net basis (gross carrying amount less the ECL allowance), reflecting the impaired status of the asset33.

This example illustrates how IFRS 9 mandates a dynamic and forward-looking approach to recognizing credit losses, adjusting provisions based on changes in credit risk over the life of the financial instrument.

Practical Applications

IFRS 9 significantly impacts various entities, particularly those with substantial holdings of financial instruments like banks, insurance companies, and investment firms. Its practical applications are pervasive in financial reporting and risk management. For banks, IFRS 9 fundamentally alters how they provision for loan losses, requiring a proactive stance based on expected future credit conditions rather than historical defaults32. This often leads to earlier recognition of provisions and can impact regulatory capital requirements.

The standard also refines how entities apply hedge accounting, allowing for a better reflection of actual risk management activities in financial statements30, 31. For instance, a company using an interest rate swap to manage interest rate exposure can more effectively link the accounting treatment of the derivative to the hedged item29. Furthermore, IFRS 9 influences corporate treasury functions, as decisions regarding the classification of financial assets impact subsequent measurement and the volatility of reported profits27, 28.

The adoption of IFRS 9 also has implications for international capital markets. For example, foreign private issuers listing securities in the United States may prepare financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the IASB without reconciliation to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), subject to certain conditions and SEC oversight25, 26.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its aims to improve financial reporting, IFRS 9 has faced certain limitations and criticisms. A primary concern revolves around the complexity and significant judgment required in implementing the ECL model, particularly in estimating forward-looking information and probabilities of default24. This can lead to increased volatility in financial statements, especially during economic downturns, as banks are required to recognize higher provisions sooner22, 23. The models developed to calculate ECL can be highly complex, demanding significant resources and expertise from financial institutions21.

Another critique relates to the potential for inconsistency. While IFRS 9 provides a more principles-based framework, the reliance on judgment, particularly in determining "significant increases in credit risk" for the ECL model's stages, can still lead to varied interpretations across entities and jurisdictions. Some argue that the standard's impact on certain types of derivatives or embedded derivatives also introduces complexities, as the bifurcation requirements from IAS 39 were largely removed for financial assets20. While IFRS 9 aimed for simplification, its intricate requirements for classification and impairment still present considerable challenges in practice.

IFRS 9 vs. IAS 39

IFRS 9 largely superseded IAS 39, "Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement," effective January 1, 2018, representing a fundamental overhaul of accounting for financial instruments. The key differences lie in three main areas: classification and measurement, impairment, and hedge accounting17, 18, 19.

Under IAS 39, financial assets were categorized into four main classifications (held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, available-for-sale, and fair value through profit or loss), each with specific measurement rules16. IFRS 9 replaced this with a more principles-based approach, classifying financial assets based on the entity's business model for managing them and the contractual cash flow characteristics, leading to measurement at amortized cost, FVTOCI, or FVTPL14, 15.

The most significant change is the impairment model. IAS 39 used an "incurred loss" model, recognizing losses only when objective evidence of impairment existed12, 13. IFRS 9 introduced a forward-looking "Expected Credit Loss (ECL)" model, requiring entities to provision for potential future losses even before a default occurs, based on past events, current conditions, and future forecasts9, 10, 11. This aims for earlier and more timely recognition of credit losses.

In hedge accounting, IFRS 9 aimed to better align accounting with risk management practices. While retaining the three hedge types (fair value, cash flow, and net investment hedges), it introduced more qualitative effectiveness testing and expanded eligible hedged items and hedging instruments, making it potentially easier to apply than IAS 39's more rigid rules6, 7, 8.

FAQs

What is the primary purpose of IFRS 9?

The primary purpose of IFRS 9 is to establish principles for the financial reporting of financial instruments, aiming to provide users of financial statements with relevant and useful information that faithfully represents the substance of these instruments. It addresses recognition, classification, measurement, impairment, and hedge accounting.

How does IFRS 9 change how companies account for loan losses?

IFRS 9 replaces the "incurred loss" model of IAS 39 with a forward-looking "Expected Credit Loss (ECL)" model. This means companies must estimate and provision for potential future credit losses on financial assets from their initial recognition, rather than waiting for an actual loss event to occur4, 5.

Does IFRS 9 apply to all financial instruments?

IFRS 9 applies to most financial instruments, including financial assets and financial liabilities. However, certain instruments, such as interests in subsidiaries, associates, and joint ventures, and rights and obligations under leases (covered by IFRS 16), are scoped out or have specific treatment under other standards.

What are the three measurement categories for financial assets under IFRS 9?

Under IFRS 9, financial assets are generally measured in one of three categories: Amortized Cost, Fair Value Through Other Comprehensive Income (FVOCI), or Fair Value Through Profit or Loss (FVTPL). The classification depends on the entity's business model for managing the assets and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the asset1, 2, 3.

AI Financial Advisor

Get personalized investment advice

  • AI-powered portfolio analysis
  • Smart rebalancing recommendations
  • Risk assessment & management
  • Tax-efficient strategies

Used by 30,000+ investors